Jones said that although he had been averse to naming the school after himself, his friends overcame his reluctance "with the argument that the school would be called by that name because of my connection with it, and to attempt to give it any other name would confuse the people." Bob Jones took no salary from the college and helped support the school with personal savings and income from his evangelistic campaigns. The Florida land boom had peaked in 1925, and a hurricane in September 1926 further reduced land values. Bob Jones College barely survived bankruptcy and its move to Cleveland, Tennessee in 1933.However, Jones's move to Cleveland proved extraordinarily advantageous.Steve Pettit and Carl Abrams talked about Bob Jones University, a Christian liberal arts college at the center of a Supreme Court Case about civil rights and religious liberty.Bob Jones University President Steve Pettit talked about the college’s history and how it came to Greenville, south Carolina.However, 40 percent of the citizens voted to keep this law.“This is the year 2000, this is a new millennium, the voters voted to remove the law from the books but what’s interesting is the margin,” Steele said.
Interracial marriages have typically been highlighted through two points of view in the United States: Egalitarianism and cultural conservatism.Interracial marriage in the United States has been fully legal in all U. states since the 1967 Supreme Court decision that deemed anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional, with many states choosing to legalize interracial marriage at earlier dates.Multiracial Americans numbered 9.0 million in 2010, or 2.9% of the total population, but 5.6% of the population under age 18.In 2008, the university estimated the number of its graduates at 35,000, in 2017, 40,000.The university's athletic teams, the Bruins, compete in Division II of the National Christian College Athletic Association (NCCAA).Alabama was the last state to overturn the legalization of interracial marriages.The high profile case of Mildred and Richard Loving, a Virginian married couple that was criminally charged for getting married under the interracial marriage ban, has been an inspiring and monumental example of the hardships interracial couples have faced as a result of the arbitrary law that was once enforced in the Southern states.This ranking scheme illustrates the manner in which the barriers against desegregation fell: Of less importance was the segregation in basic public facilities, which was abolished with the Civil Rights Act of 1964.The most tenacious form of legal segregation, the banning of interracial marriage, was not fully lifted until the last anti-miscegenation laws were struck down in 1967 by the Supreme Court ruling in the landmark Loving v. Social enterprise research conducted on behalf of the Columbia Business School (2005–2007) showed that regional differences within the United States in how interracial relationships are perceived have persisted: Daters of both sexes from south of the Mason–Dixon line were found to have much stronger same-race preferences than northern daters did.The study also observed a clear gender divide in racial preference with regards to marriage: Women of all the races which were studied revealed a strong preference for men of their own race for marriage, with the caveat that East Asian women only discriminated against Black and Hispanic men, and not against White men.Several studies have found that a factor which significantly affects an individual's choices with regards to marriage is socio-economic status ("SES")—the measure of a person's income, education, social class, profession, etc.